In Nevada, is explicit consent required from a private property owner for a CFP holder to carry concealed on their premises?

The correct answer highlights that explicit consent from a private property owner is indeed required in specific circumstances, particularly when there are signs posted that prohibit firearms. In Nevada, if a property owner has clearly indicated their intention not to allow firearms on their premises through signage, then they are establishing rules that need to be respected by those carrying a concealed firearm. This is essential for maintaining a respectful relationship between gun owners and property owners, as well as understanding and following the laws governing firearm carry rights in various locations.

In scenarios without such signage, while consent may not be explicitly required, it is considered courteous for a concealed firearm permit holder to seek permission from the property owner. This demonstrates respect for the owner’s rights and preferences regarding security and safety on their property. Being aware of and adhering to these social and legal norms is important for responsible firearm ownership.